Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Math Psychol. 2010 Feb 1;54(1):39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.01.004

Table 3.

ANOVA results from Experiment 1

Speed/Accuracy
instruction
Accuracy Mean RT Drift rates a z/a
Main effect: F(1,17) = 97.9 F(1,17) = 66.8 F(1,17) = 118.5 - -
 word frequency p < .001 p < .001 p < .001
Main effect: F(2,34) = 55.2 F(2,34) = 59.5 F(2,34) = 1.08 F(2,34) = 76.3 F(2,347) = 1.33
 instruction p < .001 p < .001 ns p < .001 ns
Interaction F(2,34) = 3.32 F(2,34) = 6.8 F(2,34) = 1.16 - -
p = .048 p = .003 ns
Bias instruction
Main effect: F(1,17) = 102.8 F(1,17) = 44.5 F(1,17) = 135.9 - -
 word frequency p < .001 p < .001 p < .001
Main effect: F(2,34) = 30.4 F(2,34) = 40.9 F(2,34)=4.45 F(2,34) = 1.2 F(2,347) =107.5
 instruction p < .001 p < .001 p = .021 ns p < .001
Interaction F(2,34) = 19.8 F(2,34) = 2.67 F(2,34) = 0.86 - -
p < .001 p = .083 ns

Note. a = boundary separation; z/a = position of starting point relative to the boundaries.