Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 12;105(5):707–717. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq034

Table 3.

Summary of multiple-site analysis

VC (s.e.) Probability (identity vs. absent) Probability (diagonal vs. identity)
(a) Random model
σf2 (s.e.) <0·001 0·008
Bodalla 19·88 (16·10)
Clunes 1·09 (2·00)
Heathcote 21·43 (12·21)
Heyfield 13·65 (8·54)
Lorne 10·76 (9·69)
Martin's Ck 46·25 (22·41)
Mt Bealiba 0·76 (1·89)
Mt Nowa Nowa 8·27 (5·59)
σfs2 1·000 0·981
σplot2 (s.e.) 6·73 (2·22) 0·465
σe2 (s.e.) <0·001
Culcairn 64·18 (4·87)
Huntly 108·18 (7·80)
Lake Tyers 31·07 (2·66)
(b) Fixed model
Wald statistic d.f. χ2 prob
Site 855·17 2 <0·001
site.replicate 21·76 9 0·010
population 111·95 7 <0·001
site. population 75·93 14 <0·001

Variance components (VC) and tests of fixed effects are given. Likelihood ratio tests were used to test whether variance components should be included (identity vs. absent) and whether each term was best modelled as a single variance component or a separate variance for each level of an appropriate factor (i.e. with a covariance structure based on an identity matrix or a diagonal one). Standard errors are shown in parentheses after each estimate. The interaction between family and site was not significant. Residual variances also varied among sites.