Table 1.
Reproductive and clonal characteristics and multilocus substructure estimators of 20 Convallaria majalis populations in Belgium
Population | x | y | Fruit set | MLG | G : N | G | rD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 190691 | 174101 | 0·01 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
2 | 191771 | 175036 | 0·06 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
3a | 189049 | 175028 | – | 1 | 0·05 (1/19 | 0 | |
3b | 188909 | 175038 | – | 3 | 0·15 (3/20) | 0·42* | 0·91* |
4 | 190557 | 175730 | 0·04 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
5 | 187403 | 175152 | – | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
6 | 188427 | 174519 | 0·11 | 3 | 0·15 (3/20) | 0·80* | 0·85* |
7 | 191815 | 172724 | 0·00 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
8 | 192934 | 172345 | 0·08 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
9 | 190149 | 176228 | 0·00 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
10 | 193618 | 171402 | 0·06 | 2 + 2† | 0·10 (4/40) | 0·90* | 0·53* |
11a | 162368 | 195660 | 0·11 | 4 | 0·21 (4/19) | 0·59* | 0·43* |
11b | 162327 | 195836 | 0·00 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
12a | 161543 | 196601 | 0·06 | 1 | 0·10 (2/20) | 0 | |
12b | 161434 | 196587 | 0·00 | 1 | 0·05 (1/20) | 0 | |
13a | 164639 | 196721 | 0·23 | 3 | 0·15 (3/20) | 0·51* | 0·74* |
13b | 164535 | 196647 | 0·39 | 2 | 0·10 (2/20) | 0·44* | 1·00* |
14 | 166062 | 197242 | 0·28 | 2 + 1† | 0·08 (3/40) | 0·31* | 0·97* |
15a | 163852 | 192246 | 0·08 | 2 + 1† | 0·08 (3/40) | 0·32* | 0·85* |
15b | 164356 | 192440 | 0·20 | 3‡ | 0·10 (2/19) | 0·51* | 0·99* |
Populations 1–10, region A; populations 11a–15b, region B. Populations with identical numbers were sampled in different parcels of the same forest fragment.
Lambert 72 co-ordinates were approximated from forest maps (http://geo-vlaanderen.gisvlaanderen.be/geo-vlaanderen/bossen/).
Fruit set is average number of fruits per flower.
For the population G : N ratio, the number of genotypes over the sample size, and G, genotypic diversity, see Materials and methods.
rD, the coefficient of multilocus linkage disequilibrium (Agapow and Burt 2001), is calculated for each population.
*P < 0·001 based on 1000 permutations.
†Twenty additional shoots were sampled in this large population.
‡The number of putative genets is MLG minus one as it is likely that a somatic mutation occurred.