Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Feb 25;38(4):317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.007

Table 2.

Bivariate associations between predictor domains and commitment to abstinence at the end of outpatient treatment: Total sample and Gender subgroups

Total sample n = 250 Males n = 143 Females n = 107

Control variables
 Male gender -.19**
 Age (years) .14* .14 .13
 Education (years completed) .11 .09 .16
 African American .14* .12 .17
 Hispanic -.13* -.09 -.19*
 Baseline Commitment to abstinence .49*** .53*** .38***
Predictor variablesa
 No. of previous SUD treatment at intake .04 .13 -.09
 Mandated to index episode (yes) at intake -.09 -.10 .03
 Length of treatment stay (in days) .17** .11 .17
 Overall helpfulness of index episode .24** .20* .27**
 Dependence severity (MINI) since baseline -.15* -.07 -.25**
 Number of days drug problems past month -.16* -.10 -.25*
 Cravings/temptation to use drugs -.16* -.15 -.15
 Perceived harm of future drug use .43*** .48*** .33**
 Drug abstinence self-efficacy .52*** .51*** .51***
 Perceived stress -.18** -.20* -20**
 Quality of life satisfaction .32*** .26** .37***
 Psychological ASI .05 .08 -.07
 Perceived social support for recovery .36*** .36*** .38***
 Number of network members in 12-step .32*** .33*** .31**
 Number of 12-step meetings attended during treatment .19** .21* .14
 Level of involvement in 12-step activities .34*** .33*** .33***

p <.1 [trend]

*

p <.05

**

p <.01

***

p <.001

a

Assessed at treatment end with the exception of prior treatment history and mandated status that were assessed at baseline