Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2009 Aug 7;47(1):123–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00876.x

Table 4.

Results of chi-square difference tests comparing the corresponding univariate and bivariate probit regression models for each diagnostic group.

Components Tested CD ADHD ODD ND AAD DAD
PC1 + P3
P3 2.57 0.06 2.23 0.44 1.18 0.01
PC1 0.02 2.15 0.50 1.37 1.23 1.75
PC2 + P3
P3 0.17 2.44 0.01 0.03 1.46 0.14
PC2 2.81 5.69 * 1.67 1.95 5.97 * 1.10
PC3 + P3
P3 0.86 4.10 * 1.51 2.94 2.22 0.97
PC3 4.58 * 8.08 ** 6.46 ** 7.01 ** 6.63 ** 2.30
PC4 + P3
P3 0.03 0.25 0.17 0.19 0.01 0.65
PC4 2.32 1.58 0.96 0.85 2.33 0.01
PC5 + P3
P3 2.92 0.09 2.07 0.93 1.64 0.35
PC5 0.03 1.00 0.93 1.87 1.44 1.36

PC3 + P3(mean)
P3(mean) 0.74 2.63 1.02 2.15 1.22 1.16
PC3 4.31* 5.91* 5.41* 5.94* 4.99* 2.53
PCs + PC3-TD
PC3-TD 8.76* 1.22 3.62 2.49 4.58 2.84
PCs 6.47* 1.03 2.18 1.68 3.61 2.55
PC3 + PC3-TD
PC3-TD 0.15 0.11 0.05 0.23 0.01 0.34
PC3 4.54* 3.55 8.39** 7.08** 8.45** 2.94

P3(mean)=mean amplitude within a 40ms window centered on the peak of P3

PCs=peak energies of PCs 1, 3, & 5, collectively

PC3-TD=mean amplitude in time-domain within the time range spanned by PC3

Note: df=1 for all tests, except df=2.

*

p ≤ .05

**

p ≤ .01

A significant result indicates that component accounted for a significant amount of variance in the bivariate model, beyond that accounted for by the other component. A non-significant result indicates that component added no significant discriminative information above that contained in the univariate model.