Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 28;16(16):2055–2060. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2055

Table 3.

Multiple stepwise regression analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model

Parameters β SE Wald P RR 95% CI
rN excluded
Tumor size -0.025 0.117 0.045 0.832 0.976 0.776-1.227
Pathology 0.000 0.161 0.000 0.999 1.000 0.730-1.370
Depth of invasion 27.144 0.000
pT2 vs pT1 0.956 0.259 13.59 0.000 2.601 1.565-4.325
pT3 vs pT1 1.253 0.247 25.668 0.000 3.500 2.156-5.683
pN category 20.572 0.000
pN1 vs pN0 0.556 0.188 8.754 0.003 1.734 1.206-2.519
pN2 vs pN0 0.829 0.203 16.673 0.000 2.291 1.539-3.410
pN3 vs pN0 1.02 0.248 16.916 0.000 2.772 1.705-4.507
rN included
Tumor size -0.033 0.117 0.078 0.779 0.968 0.769-1.218
Pathology 0.011 0.161 0.005 0.945 1.011 0.738-1.385
Depth of invasion 24.388 0.000
pT2 vs pT1 0.908 0.263 11.974 0.001 2.48 1.483-4.149
pT3 vs pT1 1.206 0.252 22.827 0.000 3.34 2.036-5.477
rN category 17.927 0.000
rN1 vs rN0 0.502 0.199 6.349 0.012 1.651 1.118-2.440
rN2 vs rN0 0.842 0.205 16.928 0.000 2.322 1.554-3.468
rN3 vs rN0 0.867 0.234 13.758 0.000 2.380 1.505-3.763