Table 2.
Correlations among study variables
| Variable | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | 9. | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Sex | – | ||||||||
| 2. Class year | .02 | – | |||||||
| 3. Student perceptions of TAC | .02 | .04 | – | ||||||
| 4. Trust and respect for teachers | .03 | .15† | .63*** | – | |||||
| 5. Beliefs about aggression | .24** | −.06 | −.20* | −.35*** | – | ||||
| 6. Proactive aggression (RPQ) | .15† | −.01 | −.07 | −.27** | .56*** | – | |||
| 7. Reactive aggression (RPQ) | −.02 | −.10 | −.26** | −.35*** | .46*** | .69*** | – | ||
| 8. Victimization scenario: SA | −.17* | −.04 | .42*** | .33*** | −.27** | −.12 | −.19* | − | |
| 9. Victimization scenario: FB | .27** | −.04 | −.24** | −.35*** | .51** | .37*** | .41*** | −.38*** | – | 
Note: SA seek school authority help, FB fight back- both responses made in their respective victimization scenarios
† p < .10; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001