Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: School Ment Health. 2009 Sep 1;1(3):118–130. doi: 10.1007/s12310-009-9006-9

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for process items in integrity systems 1 and 2

Integrity item M Median Mode SD Range
System 1 process variables*
 Encourage studentsa 1.71 2.00 2 .46 1–2
 Facilitator responsivea 1.94 2.00 2 .25 1–2
 Facilitators work well
 togethera
1.62 2.00 2 .53 0–2
 Teachers involvementa 1.25 1.00 2 .76 0–2
 Students’ behaviora 1.81 2.00 2 .53 0–2
 Behavior managementa 1.81 2.00 2 .49 0–2
System 2 process variables**
 Student enthusiasmb 5.58 5.00 5 1.50 3–9
 Student behaviorb 5.39 5.00 6 1.48 2–8
 Facilitators workingb 5.18 5.00 5 1.19 3–7
 Facilitators encourageb 5.48 5.00 5 1.23 3–8
 Teacher participationb 4.18 4.00 5 1.96 1–8
 Behavior managementb 5.33 6.00 6 1.41 1–7
 Facilitator enthusiasmb 5.15 5.00 5 1.03 3–7
 Time managementb 5.09 5.00 5 1.38 2–8
 Global/overall impressionb 5.24 5.00 6 1.42 2–8
*

corresponds to 0 = Not Implemented, 1 = partially implemented, 2 = fully implemented

**

corresponds to Likert scale 1–10 values, 1 = extremely poor, 5 = average/expected, 10 = extremely outstanding

a

n = 48

b

n = 33