Table 1.
Integrity item | M | Median | Mode | SD | Range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
System 1 process variables* | |||||
Encourage studentsa | 1.71 | 2.00 | 2 | .46 | 1–2 |
Facilitator responsivea | 1.94 | 2.00 | 2 | .25 | 1–2 |
Facilitators work well togethera |
1.62 | 2.00 | 2 | .53 | 0–2 |
Teachers involvementa | 1.25 | 1.00 | 2 | .76 | 0–2 |
Students’ behaviora | 1.81 | 2.00 | 2 | .53 | 0–2 |
Behavior managementa | 1.81 | 2.00 | 2 | .49 | 0–2 |
System 2 process variables** | |||||
Student enthusiasmb | 5.58 | 5.00 | 5 | 1.50 | 3–9 |
Student behaviorb | 5.39 | 5.00 | 6 | 1.48 | 2–8 |
Facilitators workingb | 5.18 | 5.00 | 5 | 1.19 | 3–7 |
Facilitators encourageb | 5.48 | 5.00 | 5 | 1.23 | 3–8 |
Teacher participationb | 4.18 | 4.00 | 5 | 1.96 | 1–8 |
Behavior managementb | 5.33 | 6.00 | 6 | 1.41 | 1–7 |
Facilitator enthusiasmb | 5.15 | 5.00 | 5 | 1.03 | 3–7 |
Time managementb | 5.09 | 5.00 | 5 | 1.38 | 2–8 |
Global/overall impressionb | 5.24 | 5.00 | 6 | 1.42 | 2–8 |
corresponds to 0 = Not Implemented, 1 = partially implemented, 2 = fully implemented
corresponds to Likert scale 1–10 values, 1 = extremely poor, 5 = average/expected, 10 = extremely outstanding
n = 48
n = 33