Skip to main content
. 2010 May;135(5):509–526. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200910387

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Distinguishing between Scheme IIA (H+ binding inhibits Ca2+ binding) and Scheme IIB (H+ binding inhibits gating). (A) Scheme IIA (black dashed lines) predicts that at low to nominally 0 Ca2+, the minimum Po does not change with pH, whereas Scheme IIB (red dashed lines) predicts that the minimum Po decreases by >10-fold per 0.5-unit decrease in pH (i.e., an approximate threefold increase in [H+]). (B) Po measured at nominally 0 Ca2+ plotted as a function of pH (filled circles), superimposed on the predicted Po at nominally 0 Ca2+ for Scheme IIA (black dashed line) and Scheme IIB (red dashed line). These data illustrate that Scheme IIA, in which H+ binding inhibits Ca2+ binding with no direct coupling between H+ binding and channel gating, is consistent with the experimental data.