Table 2.
CET vs TD-OCT |
CO vs TD-OCT |
CET vs CO |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Lower | Estimated | Upper | Lower | Estimated | Upper | Lower | Estimated | Upper |
Global mean | 0.272 | 0.370 | 0.505 | 0.259 | 0.353 | 0.481 | 0.733 | 0.953 | 1.239 |
Quadrants | |||||||||
Temporal | 0.186 | 0.246 | 0.325 | 0.219 | 0.290 | 0.384 | 0.905 | 1.180 | 1.540 |
Superior | 0.227 | 0.287 | 0.363 | 0.212 | 0.269 | 0.341 | 0.804 | 1.008 | 1.264 |
Nasal | 0.273 | 0.347 | 0.441 | 0.323 | 0.410 | 0.522 | 0.978 | 1.230 | 1.545 |
Inferior | 0.429 | 0.546 | 0.694 | 0.448 | 0.570 | 0.724 | 0.771 | 0.988 | 1.266 |
Clock hour | |||||||||
1 | 0.402 | 0.524 | 0.683 | 0.354 | 0.462 | 0.603 | 0.716 | 0.899 | 1.129 |
2 | 0.433 | 0.574 | 0.760 | 0.472 | 0.625 | 0.826 | 0.837 | 1.089 | 1.417 |
3 | 0.414 | 0.542 | 0.709 | 0.426 | 0.557 | 0.728 | 0.825 | 1.027 | 1.277 |
4 | 0.423 | 0.537 | 0.683 | 0.440 | 0.559 | 0.711 | 0.986 | 1.241 | 1.563 |
5 | 0.474 | 0.602 | 0.765 | 0.522 | 0.663 | 0.842 | 0.940 | 1.195 | 1.520 |
6 | 0.341 | 0.463 | 0.630 | 0.312 | 0.424 | 0.576 | 0.706 | 0.915 | 1.186 |
7 | 0.451 | 0.599 | 0.797 | 0.488 | 0.647 | 0.859 | 0.828 | 1.080 | 1.409 |
8 | 0.385 | 0.509 | 0.672 | 0.432 | 0.570 | 0.753 | 0.861 | 1.120 | 1.456 |
9 | 0.258 | 0.342 | 0.453 | 0.259 | 0.343 | 0.455 | 0.772 | 1.004 | 1.306 |
10 | 0.247 | 0.330 | 0.440 | 0.211 | 0.282 | 0.377 | 0.656 | 0.856 | 1.116 |
11 | 0.598 | 0.774 | 1.002 | 0.596 | 0.771 | 0.998 | 0.791 | 0.997 | 1.256 |
12 | 0.472 | 0.664 | 0.935 | 0.388 | 0.546 | 0.767 | 0.637 | 0.822 | 1.060 |
When a ratio is equal to one, reproducibilities (variance components (VCs)) are identical. Centred Each Time (CET) and Centred Once (CO) methods showed statistically significantly smaller VC ratios than time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) except for 11 o’clock with CET. There was no statistically significant difference in reproducibility (VC) ratios between CET and CO.