Skip to main content
. 2010 May;82(5):838–845. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.08-0383

Table 2.

Contingency table: relationship between micromethod and xenodiagnosis*

Micromethod Xenodiagnosis Total
Positive Negative
Positive 251 0 251
Negative 16 1657 1673
Total 267 1657 1924
*

The sensitivity of the micromethod vis-à-vis xenodiagnosis is 0.938 (confidence interval [CI] 95%, 0.925–0.940) and the specificity is 1 (CI 95%, 0.998–1). The positive predictive value was 0.998 (CI 95%, 0.984–1) and negative predictive value, 0.990 (CI 95%, 0.988–1). Kappa index: 96.4% (CI 95%, 0.9469–0.9817).