Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008 Nov;82(11):755–762. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20517

Table 2.

Association of Risk of Having Offspring with NTDs with Maternal Race-Ethnicity and Language Preference Subgroups

No. subjects
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Maternal race-ethnicity and language preference* NTDs Anencephaly Spina bifida Controls NTDs Anencephaly Spina bifida
Foreign-born Hispanic, Spanish preference 138 60 78 185 2.2 (1.3, 3.7) 1.7 (0.9, 3.4) 2.7 (1.3, 5.5)
Foreign-born Hispanic, English preference 24 6 18 50 1.4 (0.7, 2.8) 0.6 (0.2, 1.8) 2.3 (1.0, 5.4)
US-born Hispanic, Spanish preference 22 12 10 64 Reference Reference Reference
US-born Hispanic, English preference 36 16 20 68 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) 1.3 (0.6, 2.9) 1.9 (0.8, 4.3)
Non-Hispanic White 71 27 44 109 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) 1.3 (0.6, 2.8) 2.6 (1.2, 5.5)
*

Language preference was defined as follows, based on responses to the question: “In general, what language do you read and speak?” Foreign-born women who responded “only Spanish” or “Spanish more than English” were designated as preferring Spanish; US-born women who responded “only English” or “English more than Spanish” were designated as preferring English.