Table 2.
Association of Risk of Having Offspring with NTDs with Maternal Race-Ethnicity and Language Preference Subgroups
No. subjects |
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maternal race-ethnicity and language preference* | NTDs | Anencephaly | Spina bifida | Controls | NTDs | Anencephaly | Spina bifida |
Foreign-born Hispanic, Spanish preference | 138 | 60 | 78 | 185 | 2.2 (1.3, 3.7) | 1.7 (0.9, 3.4) | 2.7 (1.3, 5.5) |
Foreign-born Hispanic, English preference | 24 | 6 | 18 | 50 | 1.4 (0.7, 2.8) | 0.6 (0.2, 1.8) | 2.3 (1.0, 5.4) |
US-born Hispanic, Spanish preference | 22 | 12 | 10 | 64 | Reference | Reference | Reference |
US-born Hispanic, English preference | 36 | 16 | 20 | 68 | 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) | 1.3 (0.6, 2.9) | 1.9 (0.8, 4.3) |
Non-Hispanic White | 71 | 27 | 44 | 109 | 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) | 1.3 (0.6, 2.8) | 2.6 (1.2, 5.5) |
Language preference was defined as follows, based on responses to the question: “In general, what language do you read and speak?” Foreign-born women who responded “only Spanish” or “Spanish more than English” were designated as preferring Spanish; US-born women who responded “only English” or “English more than Spanish” were designated as preferring English.