Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicology. 2010 Jan 22;269(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.01.010

Figure 1. Viremia and oral shedding profiles.

Figure 1

(a) Mean ± SEM viremia for all subjects. Means presented as on the Y-axis in log10 PFU/ml when > minimum detection limit (MDL); or, as 0.00 log10 PFU/ml when < MDL (MDL for Vero cell plaque forming assay = 1.70 log10 PFU/ml). Viremia statistics summarize total viremia response curves. P < 0.0001. (b) Percent of chickens within a treatment group with a viremia greater than the MDL for the Vero cell plaque-forming assay (i.e., % positive for WN viremia within a treatment group). P < 0.05 between different letter superscripts for 3 DPI (c) Percent of chickens within a treatment group that were shedding oral virus on a given DPI. (d) Mean ± SEM fraction of days a chicken shed virus while it was alive from 1–5 DPI. P < 0.05 between different letter superscripts for panel c and d.