. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 28.

Published in final edited form as: Toxicology. 2010 Jan 22;269(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.01.010

Table.

West Nile viremia profiles (PFU/ml [%positive]) and mean ± SEM viremia-days (VD = (mean log₁₀ PFU/ml) × days viremic). Virus detection limit was 1.70 log₁₀ PFU/ml

Treatment Effect	1 DPI	2 DPI	3 DPI	4 DPI	VD^a
Vehicle (n = 10)	1.70–4.05 [100]	1.70–2.70 [80]	< 1.7 [0]	< 1.7 [0]	3.72±0.47
SR (n = 10/11)^b	2.30–3.56 [91]	1.70–2.90 [91]	1.85–2.60 [50]	< 1.7 [0]	4.81±0.45
CORT (n = 9)^c	2.60–4.83 [89]	3.30–4.95 [100]	1.70–3.18 [44]	1.70 [22]	6.83±0.50^*
CORT+SR (n = 10)	3.78–4.86 [100]	3.20–4.32 [100]	1.70–2.18 [40]	< 1.7 [0]	6.38±0.47

Notes:

Whole model results: F = 15.5252, R² = 0.64, P < 0.0001

The SR group began with 11 subjects, but 1 subject was sacrificed on 3 DPI for a study that could not be completed. Thus, n = 11 to 2 DPI and n = 10 until the termination of the experiment (i.e., on 14 DPI).

One CORT subject was not properly inoculated and was thus removed from the analysis. Thus n = 9 for group CORT.

P < 0.0001