Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):84–115. doi: 10.1037/a0014351

Table C.1.

Akaike weights for the simulations described in Appendix C. Bold values indicate the winning model. These simulations reveal that ND-TSD does not benefit from excessive flexibility.

Full set of criteria Restricted set of criteria Proportional criteria
Averaging rule Summation rule Averaging rule Summation rule
ND-TSD TSD ND-TSD TSD ND-TSD TSD ND-TSD TSD ND-TSD TSD
Simulation 1 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.80 0.00 0.00
Simulation 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.82 0.00 0.00
Simulation 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.67 0.02 0.04
Simulation 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.67 0.04 0.08
Simulation 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.34
Simulation 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.78 0.00 0.00
Simulation 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.15 0.00 0.00