Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010 May–Jun;42(3 Suppl):S11–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.01.010

Table 4.

Differences in Adjusted Mean between the Intervention and Control Groups*

2- month post-intervention
Outcome variables Intervention group
Mean (SD)
Control group
Mean (SD)
Effect
size
95% CI effect size
Lower Upper
Primary outcomes1
 Body weight (lbs) 189.66 (12.24) 192.85 (12.24) −0.26a −0.79 0.28
 Blood glucose (mg/dl)# 91.56 (14.16) 97.46 (14.13) −0.40 a −0.95 0.13
Secondary outcomes2
 Fat intake (% of total calories from fat) 31.81 (5.81) 32.12 (5.75) −0.05a −0.54 0.44
 Fruit and vegetable intake (cups/day) 6.33 (3.42) 4.73 (3.41) 0.46a −0.03 0.96
 Physical activity (MET) 41.09 (29.87) 33.51 (29.34) 0.25a −0.24 0.74
 Perceived stress 2.15 (0.36) 2.23 (0.37) −0.21 −0.70 0.28
 Positive feelings 3.46 (0.62) 3.39 (0.56) 0.11a −0.37 0.61
 Negative feelings 3.71 (0.62) 3.85 (0.63) −0.22 −0.71 0.27
8-month post-intervention
Primary outcomes3
 Body weight (lbs) 187.79 (12.43) 188.17 (12.22) −0.03a −0.73 0.67
 Blood glucose (mg/dl) # 93.51 (14.16) 89.35 (14.39) 0.28 −0.42 0.98
Secondary outcomes4
 Fat intake (% of total calories from fat) 34.20 (7.16) 32.34 (7.01) 0.26 −0.34 0.86
 Fruit and vegetable intake (cups/day) 3.87 (3.52) 5.56 (3.50) −0.47 −1.08 0.13
 Physical activity (MET) 53.20 (30.24) 36.02 (29.30) 0.57a −0.04 1.18
 Perceived stress 2.75 (0.40) 2.76 (0.39) −0.02 −0.62 0.58
 Positive feelings 3.62 (0.64) 3.45 (0.62) 0.27a -0.34 0.87
 Negative feelings 3.70 (0.64) 3.77 (0.62) −0.11 −0.71 0.49
*

Adjusted each baseline primary and secondary outcome variable.

a

Effect in hypothesized direction. Lower scores are more favorable in the shaded rows.

#

Fasting and non fasting (random) blood glucose via finger stick.

1

Data collected from 57/129 participants (intervention = 22, control = 35).

2

Data collected from 70/129 participants (intervention = 28, control = 42).

3

Data collected from 38/129 participants (intervention = 12, control = 26).

4

Data collected from 48/129 participants (intervention = 16, control = 32). Reasons for high dropped out are described elsewhere.36