Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Assessment. 2005 Dec;12(4):384–394. doi: 10.1177/1073191105279433

TABLE 2.

Correlations Between Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory—Adolescent and Dependent Variables and Between Moderator Variables and Dependent Variables

Independent Variable Alcohol Drugs Number of Charges
Scale
 FVA .27****
 OAT .16* .19**
 SAT .25**** .20**
 FVOD .21**
 DEF2 .15* .19**
 ChemDepa .27**** .20**
Moderatorsa
 White .28**** .21** .18*
 Black −.13*b −.27**** −.01
 Hispanic −.17* .00 −.17*

NOTE: FVA = Face Valid Alcohol; OAT = Obvious Attribute; SAT = Subtle Attribute; FVOD = Face Valid Other Drug; DEF2 = Defensive Dependent versus Defensive Nondependent; ChemDep = Chemically Dependent.

a

Numbers associated with these variables are point-biserial correlations. All other numbers are Pearson product moment correlations.

b

After using the Bonferroni correction, the relation was no longer significant. The correction is α/3 for three substance categories (nonsignificant drug-alcohol category not shown).

*

p ≤.05.

**

p ≤ .01.

****

p ≤ .001.