TABLE 2.
Correlations Between Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory—Adolescent and Dependent Variables and Between Moderator Variables and Dependent Variables
| Independent Variable | Alcohol | Drugs | Number of Charges |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | |||
| FVA | .27**** | ||
| OAT | .16* | .19** | |
| SAT | .25**** | .20** | |
| FVOD | .21** | ||
| DEF2 | .15* | .19** | |
| ChemDepa | .27**** | .20** | |
| Moderatorsa | |||
| White | .28**** | .21** | .18* |
| Black | −.13*b | −.27**** | −.01 |
| Hispanic | −.17* | .00 | −.17* |
NOTE: FVA = Face Valid Alcohol; OAT = Obvious Attribute; SAT = Subtle Attribute; FVOD = Face Valid Other Drug; DEF2 = Defensive Dependent versus Defensive Nondependent; ChemDep = Chemically Dependent.
Numbers associated with these variables are point-biserial correlations. All other numbers are Pearson product moment correlations.
After using the Bonferroni correction, the relation was no longer significant. The correction is α/3 for three substance categories (nonsignificant drug-alcohol category not shown).
p ≤.05.
p ≤ .01.
p ≤ .001.