Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes. 1999 Apr;48(4):870–880. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.4.870

TABLE 3.

Univariate regression models of age- and duration-adjusted skin collagen variables versus HbAlc

Collagen versus HbA1c R2 (%) P
Acid-soluble (%) versus
 Mean HbA1c up to biopsy 4.2 <0.011
 Mean HbA1c over the past year 2.4 <0.078
 HbA1c nearest to biopsy 2.0 <0.041
 Screening HbA1c 0.4 NS*
Pepsin-soluble (%) versus
 Mean HbA1c up to biopsy 15.0 <0.001
 Mean HbA1c over the past year 16.4 <0.001
 HbA1c nearest to biopsy 17.0 <0.001
 Screening HbA1c 0.4 NS*
Relative fluorescence versus
 Mean HbA1c up to biopsy 6.5 <0.001
 Mean HbA1c over the past year 6.6 <0.001
 HbA1c nearest to biopsy 5.5 <0.001
 Screening HbA1c 3.1 <0.010
Furosine (pmol/mg) versus
 Mean HbA1c up to biopsy 19.4 <0.001
 Mean HbA1c over the past year 72.3 <0.001
 HbA1c nearest to biopsy 69.4 <0.001
 Screening HbA1c 3.0 <0.012
Pentosidine (pmol/mg) versus
 Mean HbA1c up to biopsy 8.9 <0.001
 Mean HbA1c over the past year 9.6 <0.001
 HbA1c nearest to biopsy 9.6 <0.001
 Screening HbA1c 1.7 <0.058
CML (pmol/mg) versus
 Mean HbA1c up to biopsy 16.1 <0.001
 Mean HbA1c over the past year 14.4 <0.001
 HbA1c nearest to biopsy 13.8 <0.001
 Screening HbA1c 2.6 <0.020
*

HbA1c effect not significant.

Based on a regression model with significant quadratic HbA1c effect.