Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Dermatol. 2009 Jun;18(6):548–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00827.x

Table 2.

Analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area cohort independently of ethnicity and tumor type (PTC and FTC included).

Tumors BRAF mutant BRAF wild-type
Cases Controls OR
(95% CI)
Cases Controls OR
(95% CI)

MC1R
consensus
8 15 reference 17 15 reference
1 MC1R
variant
21 10 3.938
(1.2572 to
12.3322)
34 32 0.938
(0.4024 to
2.1839)
≥ 2 MC1R
variants
16 20 1.5
(0.5089 to
4.4213)
32 36 0.784
(0.3379 to
1.8202)

total 45 45 p = 0.039* 83 83 p = 0.810*

Given are odds ratios for BRAF mutant and BRAF wild-type thyroid carcinoma depending on the number of MC1R variants compared to the matched control cohort.

*

Pearson chi-square test.