Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Mar 16;51(3):1222–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.021

Table 3.

Clusters of significant brain response within the fusiform gyrus search region for object naming vs. passive viewing

Direction of response Hemisphere Subregion (Brodmann’s area) Volume (mm3) Coordinates of maximum intensity voxel t or F-score for maximum intensity voxel Eta-squared (Mean±SEM)
APOE ε3 adults
 Name > View Ŧ ą L C1. Medial fusiform gyrus (37) 768 22L, 57P, 4I 8.9 0.56±0.04
APOE ε4 adults
 Name > View L C1. Lateral posterior fusiform gyrus (37) 1024 34L, 63P, 12I 4.6 0.45±0.03
R C2. Medial fusiform gyrus (37) 640 26R, 53P, 12I 4.1 0.48±0.03
ą L C3. Medial fusiform gyrus 512 26L, 45P, 12I 4.6 0.49±0.04
Main Effect of Group
 APOE ε4 > APOE ε3 R C1. Medial fusiform gyrus (37) 448 34R, 53P, 12I 6.3 0.58±0.02

Clusters shown survived our cluster threshold alpha-protection procedure (p < 0.05, volume > 448 mm3, whole brain p < 0.05; see text for details). Note: L = left, R = right, A = anterior, P = posterior, S = superior, C = cluster.

ą

= brain response negatively correlated with naming accuracy performance at trend level (r’s >0.38)

Ŧ

= brain response positively correlated with naming response time performance at trend level (r’s >0.38)