Table 3.
Code name | Conjugate | AmB loading | Ale acid loading | % Inhibition ± SEM | LDU ± SEM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIR1668 | Poly(HPMA)–GFLG–AmB | 9.6 wt % | 0 | 36.1 ± 10.4 | 1672 ± 139 |
CIR1783 | Poly(HPMA)–GFLG–AmB | 16.9 wt % | 0 | 77.5 ± 3.0 | 1672 ± 139 |
CIR1791 | Poly(HPMA)–GFLG–AmB–Ale acid | 8.2 wt % | 5.5 wt % | 44.4 ± 2.6 | 1672 ± 139 |
CIR1792 | Poly(HPMA)–GFLG–AmB–Ale acid | 13.4 wt % | 3.9 wt % | 53.8 ± 5.2 | 1672 ± 139 |
CIR1793 | Poly(HPMA)–GFLG–AmB–Ale acid | 19.6 wt % | 1.8 wt % | 67.9 ± 6.9 | 1672 ± 139 |
AmBisome® | n/a | n/a | n/a | 99.5 ± 0.2 | 1672 ± 139 |
Values presented give the arithmetic mean ± SEM of treated groups (n = 5).
LDU Leishman–Donovan unit at the experimental endpoint.