Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 11;7(2):157–166. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nen025

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics of survival

Study Seta Pairs Mean Median Stratified log rank test
Iscador Control Iscador Control
MammaRand Complete set 38 14.7 13.8 14.8 14.3 0.194
MammaLymRand Complete set 17 4.79 2.41 6.25 2.33 0.134
MAMMARAND Complete set 55 11.7 10.3 11.3 10.8 0.057
Mamma Complete set 84 12.1 10.3 11.8 10.1 0.0002
Balanced set 73 11.93 9.98 11.8 10.0 <0.0001
Strict matching 24 11.21 9.55 11.0 10.2 0.221
MammaRec Complete set 42 6.52 5.45 5.17 4.83 0.0079
Balanced set 39 5.90 5.35 5.17 4.83 0.0231
Strict matching 29 6.08 4.44 5.17 4.33 0.0025
MammaLym Complete set 55 4.63 3.11 4.33 3.17 0.0004
Balanced set 42 3.88 3.05 3.92 3.17 0.0423
Strict matching 38 3.86 2.97 4.04 3.17 0.0516
MammaMet Complete set 83 3.56 2.51 3.33 2.25 0.0007
Balanced set 72 3.27 2.36 3.08 2.17 0.0095
Strict matching 53 3.42 2.38 3.08 2.17 0.0056
MAMMA Complete set 264 6.98 5.57 5.08 3.58 <0.0001
Balanced set 226 6.63 5.47 4.83 3.58 <0.0001
Strict matching 144 5.37 4.15 4.33 3.21 <0.0001

aGroups with a ‘balanced set’ form subgroups of complete sets of matched-pairs not favoring the patients with Iscador therapy; groups with ‘strict matching’ form subgroups of complete sets of matched-pairs of patients fulfilling exactly all matching criteria.