Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Apr 21;132(15):5345–5347. doi: 10.1021/ja910666n

Table 2.

Substrate scope

graphic file with name nihms191941t3.jpg

entry R1 R2 R3 % yielda % ee cisb
1 Ph Ph Ph 74 (3) 99
2 2-naphthyl Ph Ph 76 (4) 99
3 4-Br-C6H4 Ph Ph 67 (5) 98
4 4-Cl-C6H4 Ph Ph 65 (6) 99
5 4-F-C6H4 Ph Ph 62 (7) 99
6 4-MeO-C6H4 Ph Ph 80 (8) 99
7 2-MeO-C6H4 Ph Ph 54 (9) 99
8 2-furyl Ph Ph 73 (10) 99
9c n-propyl Ph Ph 62 (11)
10d Ph 4-Br-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 70 (12) 99
11 Ph 4-Cl-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 67 (13) 99
12 Ph 2-Cl-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 82 (14) 99
13 Ph 4-F-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 70 (15) 99
14d Ph 3-NO2-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 65 (16) 99
15d Ph 4-Tol 4-Cl-C6H4 60 (17) 98
16d Ph 4-MeO-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 62 (18) 99
17 Ph 2-furyl 4-Cl-C6H4 67 (19) 98
18 Ph 2-thienyl Ph 50 (20) 98
19d Ph 4-pyridyl Ph 78 (21) 99
20e Ph Ph 4-Br-C6H4 81 (22) 99
21d Ph Ph 2-furyl 75 (23) 99
a

Isolated yield.

b

Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC. Dr determined by 1H NMR (500 MHz) of the unpurified reaction.

c

15 mol % azolium salt A was used.

d

50 mol % Ti(Oi-Pr)4.

e

30 mol % Ti(Oi-Pr)4.