Table 4.
Sex | Age | Income | D1 | School | Family | F | df | R2 | ΔR2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | F1 | F2 | ||||||||||
White (n=227) | β Block1 | .05 | −.06 | .01 | .62*** | 24.86 | (4, 161) | .38 | |||||
β Block2 | .09 | −02 | .01 | .54*** | .05 | −.30*** | 21.61 | (6, 159) | .45 | .07*** | |||
β Block3 | .09 | −.01 | .01 | .53*** | .01 | −.24** | .14 | −.21** | 17.97 | (8, 157) | .48 | .03* | |
Black (n=206) | β Block1 | .04 | −.02 | .21** | .72*** | 37.43 | (4, 126) | .54 | |||||
β Block2 | .03 | −.03 | .16* | .68*** | .03 | −.19** | 27.36 | (6, 124) | .57 | .03* | |||
β Block3 | .03 | −.05 | .10 | .67*** | .07 | −.18* | .07 | −.24** | 23.22 | (8, 122) | .60 | .03** | |
Hispanic (n=195) | β Block1 | .01 | −.01 | −.01 | .70*** | 29.44 | (4, 122) | .49 | |||||
β Block2 | .01 | −.00 | −.01 | .71*** | .04 | −.02 | 19.38 | (6, 120) | .49 | .00 | |||
β Block3 | .01 | .01 | −.01 | .66*** | .09 | −.01 | .01 | −.24** | 17.31 | (8, 118) | .54 | .05** | |
Asian (n=188) | β Block1 | .06 | .02 | −.08 | .55*** | 12.95 | (4, 108) | .32 | |||||
β Block2 | .06 | .02 | −.09 | .54*** | .06 | −.18* | 9.46 | (6, 106) | .35 | .03 | |||
β Block3 | .04 | −.02 | −.10 | .49*** | .07 | −.14 | .07 | −.21 | 8.97 | (8, 104) | .41 | .06** |
Note. Block 1: Demographic variables-Gender, Age, Income. Block 2: Demographic Variables, S1, S2. Block 3: Demographic Variables, S1, S2, F1, F2. D1: Depression at Time 1. S1: School relationship at Time 1. S2: School relationship at Time2. F1: Family relationship at Time 1. F2: Family relationship at Time 2. All regression models were significant at p<.01.
p< .05.
p<.01.
p<.001.