Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 15;54(5):1949–1954. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01413-09

TABLE 2.

Selection of polymorphisms in new infections after therapy with AL, AQ/SP, or DP

Gene SNPc Prevalence (%) in baseline samplesa Selection (%) in new infections after prior therapy withb:
Selection byd:
AL (n = 48) AQ-SP (n = 13) DP (n = 9) AL AQ-SP DP
pfcrt K76T 72.7 52.1 76.9 77.8 WT (0.008) No (0.99) No (0.96)
pfmdr1 N86Y 36.0 18.7 61.5 33.3 WT (0.025) No (0.13) No (0.84)
Y184F 66.7 45.8 69.2 77.8 WT (0.009) No (0.91) No (0.39)
D1246Y 9.3 6.2 7.7 0 No (0.71) No (0.76) No (0.42)
pfdhfr S108N 30.8 76.9 M (0.005)
N51I 30.8 61.5 M (0.05)
C59R 28.2 76.9 M (0.002)
pfdhps A437G 76.9 69.2 No (0.41)
K540E 0 0 No
a

n = 150 for pfcrt and pfmdr1; n = 39 for pfdhfr and pfdhps.

b

Proportions of infections classified as mixed or mutant at each allele are shown.

c

SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

d

Values indicate whether statistically significant selection was toward the wild-type (WT) sequence or the mutant (M) sequence or whether there was no selection observed (No); for these assessments, P values are shown in parentheses.