Skip to main content
. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):441–447. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.441

Table 1.

Summary of participants, interventions, follow up period, size of trial, and quality of concealment of allocation

Study Details of participants Interventions No randomised (No lost to follow up or excluded) Follow up period Quality of concealment of allocation*
Problem solving therapy v standard aftercare
Gibbons et al (UK, 1978)30 Patients over 17 years who presented to A&E department after deliberate self poisoning; repeaters (⩾1 attempt) and first timers; 71% female Experimental (n=200): crisis orientated, time limited, task centred social work at home (problem solving intervention). Control (n=200): routine service—54% GP referral, 33% psychiatric referral, 13% other referral 400 12 months 3
Hawton et al (UK, 1987)31 Patients over 16 years admitted to general hospital for self poisoning; 31% repeaters; 66% female Experimental (n=41): outpatient problem orientated therapy by non-medical clinicians. Control (n=39): GP care (for example, individual support, marital therapy) after advice from clinician 80 12 months 3
Salkovskis et al (UK, 1990)32 Patients aged 16-65 years (mean 27.5) referred by duty psychiatrist after antidepressant self poisoning assessed in A&E department; all repeaters with high risk of further repetition; 50% female Experimental (n=12): domicillary cognitive behavioural problem solving treatment. Control (n=8): treatment as usual (GP care) 20 12 months 3
McLeavey et al (Ireland, 1994)33 Patients aged 15-45 years (mean 24.4) admitted to A&E department after self poisoning; 35.6% repeaters; 74% female Experimental (n=19): interpersonal problem solving skills training.34 Control (n=20): brief problem solving therapy35 39 12 months 1
Intensive care plus outreach v standard care
Chowdhury et al (UK, 1973)36 Patients (all repeaters) admitted to general hospital after deliberate self harm; 57% female Experimental (n=71): special aftercare—regular outpatient appointments; patients also seen without appointments; home visits to patients who missed appointments; emergency 24 hour telephone access. Control (n=84): normal aftercare—outpatient appointment with psychiatrist and/or social worker; non-attenders not pursued 155 6 months 1
Welu (USA, 1977)37 Suicide attempters over 16 years brought to A&E department; 60% repeaters; % female not given Experimental (n=63): special outreach programme—community mental health team contacted patient immediately after discharge; home visit arranged; weekly/twice weekly contact with therapist. Control (n=57): routine care—appointment for evaluation at the community mental health centre next day at request of treating physician 120 (1) 4 months 1
Hawton et al (UK, 1981)38 Patients ⩾16 years (mean 25.3) admitted to general hospital after deliberate self poisoning; 32% repeaters; 70% female Experimental (n=48): domicillary therapy (brief problem orientated) as often as therapist thought necessary; open telephone access to general hospital service. Control (n=48): outpatient therapy once a week in outpatient clinic in general hospital 96 12 months 3
Allard et al (Canada, 1992)39 Patients seen in A&E department for suicide attempt; 50% repeaters; 55% female Experimental (n=76): intensive intervention—schedule of visits was arranged including at least one home visit; therapy provided when needed; reminders (telephone or written) and home visits made if appointments missed. Control (n=74): treatment by another staff team in the same hospital 150 (24) 12 months 3
Van Heeringen et al (Belgium, 1995)40 Patients ⩾15 years treated in A&E department after suicide attempt; 30% repeaters; 43% female Experimental (n=258): special care—home visits by nurse to patients who did not keep outpatient appointments, reasons for not attending discussed and patient encouraged to attend. Control (n=258): outpatient appointments only; non-compliant patients not visited 516 (125) 12 months 3
Van der Sande et al (Netherlands, 1997)41 Patients ⩾16 years (mean 36.3) admitted to hospital after suicide attempt; 73% repeaters; 66% female Experimental (n=140): brief psychiatric unit admission, encouraging patients to contact unit on discharge; outpatient therapy plus 24 hour emergency access to unit. Control (n=134): usual care—25% admitted to hospital, 65% outpatient referral 274 12 months 3
Emergency card v standard aftercare
Morgan et al (UK, 1993)21 Mean age 30 years; patients admitted after first episode of deliberate self harm; % female not given Experimental (n=101): standard care plus green card (emergency card indicating that doctor was available and how to contact them). Control (n=111): standard care—for example, referral back to primary healthcare team, psychiatric inpatient admission 112 12 months 3
Cotgrove et al (UK, 1995)22 Patients aged 12.2-16.7 years (mean 14.9) admitted after deliberate self harm; % repeaters not given; 85% female Experimental (n=47): standard care plus green card (emergency card)—green card acted as passport to readmission into paediatric ward in local hospital. Control (n=58): standard follow up treatment from clinic or child psychiatry department 105 12 months 1
Dialectical behaviour therapy v standard aftercare
Linehan et al (USA, 1991)27 Patients aged 18-45 years who had self harmed within 8 weeks before entering study; all female; all multiple repeaters of self harm Experimental (n=32): dialectical behaviour therapy (individual and group work) for 1 year; telephone access to therapist. Control (n=31): treatment as usual; 73% individual psychotherapy 63 (24) 12 months 3
Inpatient behaviour therapy v inpatient insight orientated therapy
Liberman and Eckman (USA, 1981)42 Patients (mean (range) age 29.7 (18-47) years) all repeaters; patients referred by psychiatric emergency service or hospital A&E department after deliberate self harm; 67% female Experimental (n=12): inpatient treatment with behaviour therapy. Control (n=12): inpatient treatment with insight orientated therapy; both groups received individual and group therapy plus aftercare at community mental health centre or with private therapist 24 24 months 2
Same therapist (continuity of care) v different therapist (change of care)
Torhorst et al (Germany, 1987)28 Patients referred to toxological department of Technical University Munich after deliberate self poisoning; 48% repeaters; 62% female Experimental (n=68): continuity of care—therapy with same therapist who assessed patient in hospital after attempt. Control (n=73): change of care—therapy with different therapist than seen at hospital assessment 141 (8) 12 months 2
General hospital admission v discharge
Waterhouse and Platt (UK, 1990)43 Patients ⩾16 years (mean 30.3) admitted to A&E department for deliberate self harm; 36% repeaters; 63% female Experimental (n=38): general hospital admission. Control (n=39): discharge from hospital; on discharge both groups advised to contact GP if they needed further help 77 16 weeks 3
Flupenthixol v placebo
Montgomery et al (UK, 1979)26 Patients aged 18-68 years (mean 35.3) admitted after suicidal act; all repeaters; 70% female Experimental (n=18): 20 mg intramuscular flupenthixol deconate for 6 months. Control (n=19): placebo for 6 months 37 (7) 6 months 3
Antidepressants v placebo
Hirsch et al (UK, 1982)16 R Draper, S Hirsch (personal communication) Patients aged 16-65 years admitted after deliberate self poisoning; % repeaters and % female not given Experimental (n=76): antidepressants—either 30-60 mg mianserin for 6 weeks or 75-150 mg nomifensine for 6 weeks. Control (n=38): placebo for 6 weeks 114 12 weeks 3
Montgomery et al (UK, 1983)44 Patients with personality disorders (mean age 35.7 years) admitted to medical ward after deliberate self harm; all repeaters; 66% female Experimental (n=17): mianserin 30 mg for 6 months. Control (n=21): placebo 38 6 months 3
Long term therapy v short term therapy
Torhorst et al (Germany, 1988)45 All patients repeaters who had deliberately self poisoned; % female not given Experimental (n=40): long term therapy—one therapy session a month for 12 months. Control (n=40): short term therapy—12 weekly therapy sessions for 3 months; all participants had brief crisis intervention (3 days) in hospital 80 12 months 2
*

1=poorest quality; 3=best quality.