Skip to main content
. 2010 May 5;102(9):596–604. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq091

Table 1.

Incidence of any and clinically significant hypertension in clinical trials of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway (VSP) inhibitors*

Agent First author, year (reference) Total No. of patients treated Total incidence, % Incidence of grade ≥ 3, % Incidence of any grade hypertension in the comparator group, %
Aflibercept Tew, 2007 (15) 162 46 18 NA
Axitinib Rugo, 2007 (16) 167 30 5 5
Bevacizumab Hurwitz, 2004 (17) 790 22 11 8
Cediranib Hirte, 2008 (18) 49 72 33 NA
Motesanib Sherman, 2008 (19) 93 56 25 NA
Pazopanib Hutson, 2007 (20) 161 37 8 NA
Sorafenib Escudier, 2007 (21) 902 17 4 2
Sunitinib Motzer, 2007 (22) 735 24 8 1
Vandetanib Arnold, 2007 (23) 106 21 2 9
*

For each agent, one of the larger studies with that drug and the reported incidence of hypertension by the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is listed. For some agents, data from a randomized placebo-controlled trial are not yet available. Note the differences in reported rates, and grades cannot be accurately compared across trials because of differing clinical setting and the CTCAE versions used, but in every trial with a comparator arm, the incidence of hypertension is higher with the addition of the VSP inhibitor. NA = not applicable (no untreated comparator group).

Based on CTCAE version 3.0 (grade 3 hypertension is defined as “requiring more than one drug or more intensive therapy than previously”).

Based on CTCAE version 2.0 (grade 3 hypertension is defined as “requiring initiation or increase medication”).