Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 29;37(4):1788–1795. doi: 10.1118/1.3352687

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Distribution of estimated lesion status values estimated using latent class methodology for LIDC data set with n=1145 lesion candidates, K=4 readers in both reference and CAD groups (0 is definitely not a nodule, 1 is definitely a nodule). Estimated parameters are given in Table 3.