Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 29;40(6):751–761. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0928-8

Table 4.

Hierarchical regression analysis of DRQ by CA, VIQ, attachment and ToM and their interactions

Predictors Positive social orientation Responsiveness Coordinated play
ΔR 2 β ΔR 2 β ΔR 2 β
Step 1 .14b .23a .33a
 CA .34c .26b .32a
 VIQ .16 .40a .48a
Step 2 .07c .07a .08b
 CA .31b .24c .29b
 VIQ .09 .32b .40a
 Nationality .15 −.07 .12
 Disability .24c .26b .27b
Step 3 .04 .00 .00
 CA .34b .24c .28b
 VIQ .05 .31b .41a
 Nationality .09 −.08 .13
 Disability .17 .25c .29b
 1IPPA-G .29c .05 −.05
 2SA −.13 −.03 .03
Step 4 .00 .00 .04c
 CA .34b .24c .28b
 VIQ .04 .28b .33b
 Nationality .09 −.06 .18c
 Disability .16 .23c .21c
 IPPA-G .29c .04 −.08
 SA −.12 −.03 .04
 3ToM .013 .07 .23c
Step 5 .10b .05c .08b
 CA .34a .19c .17c
 VIQ .17 .30b .33b
 Nationality .13 −.00 .29b
 Disability .17 .26c .25b
 IPPA-G .24 .02 −.15
 SA −.08 −.02 .00
 ToM −.04 −.07 .09
 SA × ToM .20c
 VIQ × ToM −.27c −.26b
 4Dis. × CA .34b
 CA × IPPA-G −.26c
R 2 .35a .35a .53a

a p < .001; p < .01; c  p < .05; †  p = .06

Note: 1IPPA-G: global mother–child relationships; 2SA-secure attachment based on the KSS; 3ToM: theory of mind based on second-order false-belief task; 4Dis = disability ASD/typical