Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):813–820. doi: 10.1037/a0019046

Table 2.

Correlations Among All Measures

Measure 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
1. Symbol Search .77
2. Digit Symbol Coding .51** .84
3. PM N Back −.03 .11 .62
4. Operation Span .08 .10 .36 ** .77
5. Listening Span .05 −.04 .30 ** .54** .74
6. WM N Back .05 .13 .35 ** .32 ** .41** .77
7. Story Recall .02 .00 .15* .24 ** .31 ** .30 ** .64
8. Verbal Paired Associates I .05 .11 .17 * .07 .07 .16 * .25 ** .86
9. Family Pictures I .15 .07 .08 .06 .17 * .13 .28 ** .22 ** .72
10. Raven’s .06 .09 .22 ** .29 ** .33 ** .38 ** .20 ** .07 .20 ** .75
11. Block Design .27 ** .11 .29 ** .29 ** .31 ** .34 ** .15 * .17 * .28 ** .41 ** .75
12. Matrix Reasoning .14 .12 .19 * .18 ** .26 ** .32 ** .20 ** .18 * .21 ** .40 ** .40 ** .65
**

Note: represents p < 0.01,

*

represents p < 0.05. Italicized numbers on the diagonal represent Cronbach’s Alpha measure of internal consistency, reported from the raw data, with the exception of the two measures of processing speed. As these were speeded measures, test-retest stability coefficients were used instead. These values are reported from the normed values available in the Technical Manual, across the normative sample (Wechsler, 1997a).