Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 15;285(20):15430–15439. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.110593

TABLE 1.

Summary of 3-OMG transport in bEnd.3 cells

Zero-trans uptakea
Equilibrium exchange uptakeb
Kmc 95% confidence intervalsc Relative Vmaxc 95% confidence intervalsc nd Km 95% confidence intervalsc Relative Vmaxc 95% confidence intervalsc nd
Control 6.7 ± 0.4 5.1 to 8.4 1 0.9 to 1.1 12 14.9 ± 12.6 −62.2 to 99.9 3.17 ± 0.46e −3.1 to 9.5 3
CN 18.7 ± 6.7 −10.5 to 47.9 7.32 ± 1.2e,f 2.1 to 12.6 6 18.4 ± 13.9 −41.4 to 78.3 10.0 ± 3.5e −4.8 to 24.9 3
FCCP 30.1 ± 18.4 −48.9 to 109.2 4.26 ± 1.4 −1.8 to 10.2 6 35.9 ± 27.8 −83.9 to 155.8 14.6 ± 6.5e −13.5 to 42.6 3
Glucose deprivation 29.4 ± 11.0 −8.6 to 20.5 1.7 ± 0.3e 0.5 to 2.7 3
AICAR 8.4 ± 4.0 −8.8 to 25.7 2.0 ± 0.3e 0.6 to 3.4 4

a Unidirectional sugar uptake into cells was depleted of sugar at 4 °C for 15 min.

b Unidirectional sugar uptake was into cells where [3-OMG]i = [3-OMG]o.

c The concentration dependence of sugar uptake was analyzed by nonlinear regression assuming Michaelis-Menten kinetics to obtain Km and Vmax. All Vmax values are expressed relative to Vmax for zero-trans uptake in matched control cells. Control zero-trans 3-OMG uptake Vmax = 180 pmol/μg/min. Results are shown as mean ± S.E., and the 95% confidence intervals for the analysis are indicated.

d Number of separate experiments in which 3-OMG transport was measured was at least four different [3-OMG].

e Vmax is significantly greater than control Vmax for zero-trans uptake (p < 0.05).

f CN stimulation of Vmax for 3-OMG zero-trans uptake is 3.18 ± 0.92-fold greater than FCCP stimulation of uptake.