Skip to main content
. 2010 May 6;6(5):e1000767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000767

Figure 2. Mean unfolding stability Inline graphic versus misfolding stability Inline graphic for neutrality exponent Inline graphic (non-neutral regime).

Figure 2

The sets of points joined with solid lines correspond to constant GC usage, between Inline graphic (largest Inline graphic) and Inline graphic (largest Inline graphic). Inline graphic grows and Inline graphic decreases with Inline graphic. The sets of points joined with dashed lines correspond to constant population size Inline graphic, from Inline graphic (smallest stability) to Inline graphic (largest stability). Both stability variables Inline graphic increase with Inline graphic. Data points are superimposed to a heat map of the fitness function, showing that fitness increases with Inline graphic. However, constant Inline graphic lines do not correspond to constant fitness, but there are small variations, from which the optimal GC usage is derived. The solid white line shows Inline graphic at which the selective pressures on Inline graphic and Inline graphic balance. One can see that, at large Inline graphic, Inline graphic is smaller than Inline graphic for all Inline graphic, so that the selective pressure is stronger on the former.