Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 3;468(6):1660–1668. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1117-y

Table 4.

Comparison with previous studies using expandable prostheses

Study Number of patients Age (years)* Number of patients who underwent lengthening (%) Deaths (%) Amputations (%) Amount extended (cm)* Final limb shortening (cm)* Revisions (%) Followup (years)*
Current study 56 10.5 (6.9–13.9) 35 (63%) 10 (18%) 3 (5%) 7.8 (4–14) 2.6 (0–6.5) 0 (0%) 11.8 (0.8–17.8)
Unwin and Walker [24] (1996) 168 10.5 (3–18) 96 (57%) 28 (16.7%) 13 (7.8%) 3.1 Not described 38/123 (31%) 2.4 (0.2–9.2)
Cool et al. [7] (1997) 24 10.1 (5.8–14) 22 (92%) 1 (5%) Excluded Not described Not described 5/23 (22%) 4.7 (2.5–7.9)
Schindler et al. [21] (1997) 18 11 (8–14) 12 (67%) 4 (22%) 2 (11%) 5.2 (3.0–7.0) < 3.5 10/12 (83%) 8.7 (6.0–13.2)
Grimer et al. [13] (2000) 20 9.9 (5–14) 11 (55%) 5 (25%) 4 (20%) Not described 1.0 9/11 (82%) > 5
Eckardt et al. [9] (2000) 32 9.7 (3–15) 16 (50%) 10 (31%) 3 (9%) 2 (1–9) < 3 13/16 (81%) 8.8 (4.5–13)
Neel et al. [18] (2003) 18 11 (7–15) 13 (87%) 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 3.2 (0.2–5.6) Not described 8/16 (50%) 1.8 (1–2.8)
Arkader et al. [2] (2007) 12 11.6 (5.9–15.5) 8 (67%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 4.9 Not described 8/12 (67%) 6.3 (1–12.7)

* Values are expressed as means, with ranges in parentheses.