Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;46(6):761–768. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.002

Table 3.

Summary of subject performance on olfactory and flavour tests.

Subject age, gender
Olfactory (UPSIT)a
Flavours
Part 1
Part 2
Patients Raw/40 %ile Task 1: Perception (A-prime) Task 2: Flavour combination congruenced (proportion correct) Task 3: Flavour identificationa,c (proportion correct) Flavour combination pleasantnessd (proportion in agreement with intended congruence classification)e
1 55 M 30 >20 .97 .56 .75 .76
2 59 M 17 <5 .9 .47 .45 .81
3 63F 15 <5 .91 .33 .4 N/A
4 56 M 19 <5 .73 (.79)b .59 .7 .53



Healthy controls
1 67 M 34 >50 1 .85 .9 .74
2 52 M 28 >10 .95 .75 .75 .66
3 62F 31 >15 .93 .89 .9 .73
4 60 M 35 >50 1 .9 .9 .81
5 65 M 33 >40 .99 .74 .85 .73
6 63F 30 >10 .93 .84 .85 .76
a

Presented in cross-modal simultaneous word–picture matching format.

b

Simultaneous presentation of jelly beans in each pair.

c

Chance performance = .33.

d

Chance performance = .5.

e

See text for explanation.