Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J S C Med Assoc. 2009 Dec;105(7):309–317.

Table 2.

CAG Functioning

CAG Year 1
2006/2007
N= 21
CAG Year 2
2007/2008
N=18
CAG Year 3
2008/2009
N=19
Listen to ideas of all members 3.3 3.17 3.41
Give you a chance to share your ideas and views 3.29 3.06 3.44
Make people feel welcome and wanted as part of the CAG 3.57 3.11 3.28
Create a safe place to share views and ideas 3.33 3.31 3.28
Bring together people with an interest in HIV/AIDS and HPV/cervical cancer 3.62 3.28 3.61
Help new members understand the project 3.15 2.78 2.89
Use the storymaps to tell the story of disparities 2.95 3.13 3.29
Celebrate progress 3.30 3.06 3.35
Share information about CAG activities (for example, there is not a lot of “insider”
information that only a few in the CAG know)
3.16 3.06 3.11
Share information about upcoming events and activities to all CAG members 3.48 3.00 3.33
Share information about HIV/AIDS and/or HPV/cervical cancer work in Orangeburg
County
3.33 3.06 3.39
Accomplish what we should during the meeting 3.10 2.67 3.28
Accomplish what we should outside the meeting time 2.94 2.65 3.12
Have an agreed upon method of leadership 3.14 2.78 3.31
Have an agreed upon process for making decisions 3.10 3.85 3.06
Share responsibility and workload so that work is accomplished together 3.05 2.75 3.18
Build a clear mission of CAG/EXPORT 3.11 2.59 3.00
Resolve conflict within group 3.0 2.76 3.18
There is a shared vision for the CAG 3.15 3.00 3.11
The CAG has a set of goals and strategies for creating change in Orangeburg
County.
3.05 2.88 3.06
I can see how my personal vision fits the CAG vision. 2.95 3.00 3.22
CAG works with a broad range of groups in Orangeburg County. 2.86 2.72 3.22
CAG members share responsibility and workload so that work is collaborative. 3.00 2.71 3.00
CAG decisions are made together with everyone on the CAG having the opportu-
nity to participate.
3.00 3.00 3.06
As a group we are able to resolve conflict in order to reach a decision. 3.00 2.89 3.11
Decision making power is shared and not in the hands of a few. 3.05 2.94 2.94
Leadership in the CAG is shared. 3.10 2.71 3.11
All CAG members are heard and respected. 3.11 3.06 3.17
Capacities and skills of CAG members are recognized and used with the CAG
process.
2.94 2.82 3.11
Information about upcoming CAG events and activities are shared with all mem
bers.
3.25 2.88 3.44
The communication activities of the CAG enhance communication with the larger
community.
2.94 2.76 3.06
CAG members have relationships to gain support of local organizations. 3.00 2.88 3.17
Successful activities of the CAG are incorporated into ongoing work of local organi-
zations
2.90 3.00 3.11

Note: Table reflects means responses for how much each respondent agreed with each statement on a scale of one (strongly disagree) to four (strongly agree)