Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Neurol. 2010 Feb 1;223(2):496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.01.016

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Histomorphometric comparisons of nerve regeneration in the mid-graft of the different grafts (motor, mixed or sensory) in the femoral motor and sensory branch after 5 weeks. No differences were seen in the quantification of A) total number of fibers, B) percent nerve, C) fiber density, or D) fiber width between any of the experimental groups regardless of modality match or mismatch. E) Quantification of the percent debris revealed a difference between sensory grafts used in femoral sensory branch when compared to motor or mixed grafts used in the femoral sensory branch (* indicate p < 0.05 vs. sensory graft to the femoral sensory branch, bars are averages, error bars are standard deviation, Motor to Motor n = 6, Mixed to Motor n = 6, Sensory to Motor n = 7, Motor to Sensory n = 6, Mixed to Sensory n = 7, and Sensory to Sensory n = 6)