Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 3;30(9):3398–3408. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5620-09.2010

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

M4Rs (and not M2Rs) are required for mAChR control of DA release in NAc core. a–d, Mean peak [DA]o ± SEM versus frequency in NAc core during four pulse trains (1–100 Hz) in control conditions (filled circles) or Oxo-M (unfilled) or Oxo-M plus DHβE (gray fill) normalized to [DA]o released by a single pulse in control conditions (left) or own condition (right), in wild types (WT) (a), M5R-knock-outs (M5R KO) (b), M2R-knock-outs (M2R KO) (c), and M4R-knock-outs (M4R KO) (d) (n = 9–12). The asterisks indicate significance level in post hoc t tests for Oxo-M versus controls: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. The daggers indicate significance level in post hoc t tests for Oxo-M versus Oxo-M plus DHβE: †††p < 0.001. Significance levels for comparison of Oxo-M plus DHβE versus control, or for data in right-hand panels, are omitted for clarity. a–c, In wild types, M5R-KO, or M2R-KO, Oxo-M significantly modifies evoked [DA]o in an activity-dependent manner and additional application of DHβE does not modify evoked [DA]o further (n = 9–12). d, In M4R-KO, Oxo-M does not modify evoked [DA]o, but subsequent addition of DHβE modifies [DA]o in a marked and significant, activity-dependent manner (n = 12).