Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2010 May 7;9(5):2488–2495. doi: 10.1021/pr901163d

Table 1. Searching with 10 previously identified spectra.

The table lists, for each of the 10 spectra, the scan number, charge state (“+”), number of candidate products (all peptides pairs with every possible link), number of candidate peptide pairs, the two peptides, the inferred location of the cross-linker according to the previous method (“Loc (old)”) and the proposed method (“Loc (new)”), and the q-value assigned to the match. Spectra for which the two methods disagree on the location of the linker are marked with an asterisk in the “Diff” column.

Scan + #Prod #Pairs Peptide 1 Peptide 2 Loc (old) Loc (new) q-val Diff
1267 4 7 2 kviknvaevk lymaed (1, 6) (4, 6) 0.005 *
1370 4 6 2 fleehpggeevlr viknvaevk (4, 3) (4, 3) 0.005
1605 5 14 2 eqaggdatenfedvghstdar ysdyfkpfstgkr (1, 6) (1, 6) 0.000
1615 5 14 2 eqaggdatenfedvghstdar ysdyfkpfstgkr (9, 12) (9, 6) 0.030 *
1758 5 18 5 eqaggdatenfedvghstdar ysdyfkpfstgk (6, 6) (6, 6) 0.000
1653 4 12 6 fleehpggeevlr yklcvipr (3, 2) (3, 2) 0.000
1654 5 12 6 fleehpggeevlr yklcvipr (3, 2) (4, 2) 0.838 *
1657 5 12 6 fleehpggeevlr yklcvipr (3, 2) (3, 2) 0.000
1658 4 12 6 fleehpggeevlr yklcvipr (3, 2) (3, 2) 0.000
1662 5 12 6 fleehpggeevlr yklcvipr (3, 2) (3, 2) 0.005