Table 3.
Trends over time according to SES and tumor thickness: Incidence rate ratio1 comparing period 2 (1998–2002) to period 1 (1988–1992)
Thickness | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SES 2 | Women | Men | All | |||
0–64 yrs | 65+ yrs | 0–64 yrs | 65+ yrs | 0–64 yrs | 65+ yrs | |
≤1mm | ||||||
1 | 2.24 | 2.01 | 2.22 | 2.70 | 2.26 | 2.42 |
2 | 1.88 | 1.97 | 1.98 | 2.38 | 1.93 | 2.19 |
3 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.89 | 2.18 | 1.94 | 2.13 |
4 | 2.08 | 2.13 | 1.76 | 2.13 | 1.93 | 2.17 |
5 | 1.67 | 1.84 | 1.73 | 1.97 | 1.69 | 1.95 |
1.01–2mm | ||||||
1 | 5.25 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 3.97 | 4.4 | 4.89 |
2 | 3.8 | 3.89 | 3.83 | 8.11 | 3.5 | 5.56 |
3 | 3.14 | 3.58 | 3.09 | 4.68 | 3.11 | 4.24 |
4 | 2.36 | 4.14 | 2.54 | 4.06 | 2.42 | 4.16 |
5 | 2.55 | 2.44 | 2.47 | 3.28 | 2.5 | 2.98 |
2.01–4mm | ||||||
1 | - | 12.25 | 3.33 | 6.52 | 5.00 | 8.3 |
2 | 4.00 | 8.83 | 5.67 | 9.75 | 4.33 | 9.88 |
3 | 2.67 | 4.45 | 2.83 | 4.88 | 3.00 | 5.27 |
4 | 2.50 | 2.57 | 2.25 | 4.39 | 2.33 | 3.48 |
5 | 2.25 | 3.33 | 2.29 | 3.05 | 2.00 | 3.23 |
≥4.01mm | ||||||
1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 13.0 | 5.48 | 8.0 | 5.38 |
2 | - | 4.5 | 3.33 | 11.29 | 4.0 | 6.71 |
3 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.33 | 6.69 | 3.5 | 5.44 |
4 | 2.0 | 4.13 | 2.67 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 5.17 |
5 | 2.0 | 4.33 | 2.67 | 4.36 | 2.0 | 4.31 |
Unknown3 | ||||||
1 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.68 |
2 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.45 | 0.61 |
3 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.42 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.64 |
4 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.61 |
5 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.54 |
All | ||||||
1 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.74 | 2.07 | 1.70 | 1.93 |
2 | 1.49 | 1.71 | 1.51 | 1.98 | 1.50 | 1.87 |
3 | 1.54 | 1.67 | 1.43 | 1.81 | 1.49 | 1.81 |
4 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.37 | 1.88 | 1.42 | 1.83 |
5 | 1.30 | 1.55 | 1.32 | 1.63 | 1.31 | 1.63 |
- used when unable to calculate ratio since denominator equal to zero
Incidence rate ratio was calculated as the number of new cases of melanoma per 100,000 which occurred during period 1 (1998–2002) divided by the number of new cases of melanoma per 100,000 in period 2 (1988–1992)
Socioeconomic status was divided into 5 quintiles based on an index of neighborhood SES based on characteristics of the census tract of patient residence at the time of diagnosis. SES1 (lowest), SES 5 (highest) (Yost et al., 2001)
The percentage of cases with missing thickness across SES groups 1 through 5 is: 32%, 28%, 25%, 22% and 21% respectively