Table 2.
English speaking status |
NES and ESOL | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NES |
ESOL |
differences |
||||||
Measures | M | SD | reliability | M | SD | reliability | F | Effect size |
PPVT | 134.06 | 18.01 | .95d | 94.07 | 31.99 | .98d | 234.75*** | .39 |
BNT | 35.78 | 7.27 | .89d | 19.31 | 8.84 | .92d | 385.38*** | .51 |
WJ Passage Comprehension | 25.97 | 4.19 | .77d | 19.20 | 3.85 | .79d | 251.38*** | .41 |
GORT Comprehension | 24.76 | 9.73 | .58e | 19.78 | 9.48 | .55e | 24.05*** | .06 |
WJ Letter-Word Identification | 49.41 | 4.46 c | .75d | 50.94 | 4.59 c | .69d | 10.37** | .03 |
Sight Word Reading Test | 28.57 | 7.51 | .87d | 20.88 | 7.19 | .86d | 97.67*** | .21 |
TOWRE Sight Word | 64.06 | 11.32 | .84e | 62.41 | 10.99 | .75e | 1.96 | .01 |
WJ Reading Fluency | 38.45 | 9.47 | .82e | 31.54 | 9.93 | .83e | 46.10*** | .11 |
GORT Fluency | 43.88 | 12.86 | .65e | 38.22 | 11.93 | .74e | 18.46*** | .05 |
CTOPP Rapid Letter Naming Ratea | .032 | .008 | .83e | .031 | .007 | .72e | 3.90* | .01 |
CTOPP Rapid Color Naming Ratea | .020 | .005 | .79e | .017 | .004 | .77e | 26.13*** | .07 |
TOWRE Phonemic Decoding | 16.81 | 10.71 | .79e | 32.50 | 11.03 | .77e | 188.37*** | .34 |
WJ Word Attack | 12.56 | 6.17 | .89d | 17.72 | 5.78 | .83d | 66.05*** | .15 |
CTOPP Elision | 6.25 | 2.47 | .80d | 7.17 | 4.61 | .92d | 6.13* | .02 |
CTOPP Elision Square Rootb | 2.65 | .46 | na | 2.73 | .84 | na | 1.39 | .004 |
CTOPP Blending Words | 5.53 | 3.05 | .84d | 7.29 | 4.32 | .88d | 21.05*** | .05 |
Note. PPVT = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Third Edition; BNT = Boston Naming Test; WJ = Woodcock Johnson-III: Tests of Achievement; TOWRE = Test of Word Reading Efficiency; GORT = Gray Oral Reading Tests – Fourth Edition; CTOPP = Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing; na = not applicable.
Rate score is the inverse of the raw time score. This transformation results in higher scores that indicate better performance.
The transformation is the square root of the sum of the CTOPP Elision raw score and 1. This transformation improves normality for the NES participants.
Range is limited on this test as all participants read from the third through fifth grade level according to this assessment.
Reliability coefficient computed was Cronbach's alpha.
Reliability coefficient was test retest for 108 NES participants and 88 ESOL participants with approximately 4 months between testing points.
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001