Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 4;15(1):55–66. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0121-1

Table 5.

Expression patterns produced by the interaction of temperature and clinical diagnosis

Expression pattern Gene Sepsis, N = 175 Noninfectious SIRS, N = 177 Note
(See text) P R R2 Significant? Temperature effect P R R2 Significant? Temperature effect
1 DNAJC4 <0.001 0.280 0.078 Yes Up 0.801 0.019 <0.001 No No effect
2 HSF-2 0.211 −0.095 0.009 No No effect 0.092 0.127 0.016 Trendb Up
HSP70-1A 0.673 −0.032 0.001 No No effect 0.024 0.169 0.029 Yes Up
HSP70-1B 0.387 −0.066 0.004 No No effect 0.025 0.168 0.028 Yes Up
HSPA1L 0.351 −0.071 0.005 No No effect 0.063 0.140 0.020 Trendb Up
PTGES 0.402 −0.064 0.004 No No effect 0.037 0.157 0.025 Yes Up
3 CXCL13 0.083 −0.131 0.017 Trendb Down 0.598 0.040 0.002 No No effect a
F11R 0.035 −0.159 0.025 Yes Down 0.376 0.067 0.004 No No effect
FOLH1 0.112 −0.120 0.014 Trendb Down 0.204 0.096 0.009 No No effect
LBP 0.074 −0.135 0.018 Trendb Down 0.165 0.105 0.011 No No effect
4 DNAJB12 0.300 0.079 0.006 No No effect 0.093 −0.127 0.016 Trendb Down
IL-8 0.840 −0.015 <0.001 No No effect 0.001 −0.248 0.062 Yes Down a

P and R values were computed by Pearson’s correlation unless otherwise specified

aP and R values calculated by Spearman’s rho

bA trend was defined as 0.05 < P < 0.125