Table D.3.
Difference between Balanced and Unbalanced Panel Reduced Form Estimates and Tests for Attrition
| Log Wealth | Husband's Health | Wife's Health | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Difference | std.error | Difference | std.error | Difference | std.error | |||
| wealth t−1 | −0,023 | 0,031 | hlt m t−1 | −0,007 | 0,028 | hlt f t−1 | −0,031 | 0,024 |
| wealth t−2 | 0,038 | 0,019 | hlt m t−2 | −0,013 | 0,011 | hlt f t−2 | −0,007 | 0,009 |
| wealth t−1 × t | 0,017 | 0,013 | hlt m t−3 | −0,014 | 0,012 | hlt f t−3 | −0,003 | 0,010 |
| hlt m t−1 | 0,258 | 0,101 | hlt m t−1 × t | −0,007 | 0,006 | hlt f t−1 × t | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| hlt m t−2 | 0,044 | 0,053 | wealth t−1 | −0,037 | 0,017 | wealth t−1 | −0,039 | 0,018 |
| hlt m t−1 × t | −0,050 | 0,019 | wealth t−2 | −0,004 | 0,008 | wealth t−2 | −0,004 | 0,007 |
| hlt f t−1 | 0,090 | 0,108 | wealth t−1 × t | 0,009 | 0,004 | wealth t−1 × t | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| hlt f t−2 | 0,012 | 0,042 | hlt f t−1 | −0,002 | 0,004 | hlt m t−1 | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| hlt f t−1 × t | −0,010 | 0,022 | hlt f t−2 | 0,004 | 0,003 | hlt m t−2 | −0,002 | 0,002 |
| hlt f t−1 × t | 0,001 | 0,002 | hlt m t−1 × t | −0,001 | 0,001 | |||
| Chi-square | 19,74 | Chi-square | 27,81 | Chi-square | 12,58 | |||
| p-value | 0,013 | p-value | 0,0019 | 0,248 | ||||
Notes: For each variable, the difference between parameter estimate from balanced and unbalanced sample is reported along with standard errors calculated from 50 boostrap replications. "Chi-squae" refers to the Nijman Verbeek (1996) test comparing all parameter estimates.