Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 11;298(5):G732–G745. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00332.2009

Table 1.

Effect of chronic ethanol consumption and SAM on liver SAM, SAH, and SAM/SAH ratio

Tissue/Treatment SAM SAH SAM/SAH ratio
Liver*
    Control 2.09 ± 0.17 0.54 ± 0.04 3.9 ± 0.22
    Ethanol 1.62 ± 0.13 0.73 ± 0.06 2.2 ± 0.05
    Control + SAM 2.09 ± 0.10 0.58 ± 0.05 3.8 ± 0.42
    Ethanol + SAM 1.95 ± 0.09 0.88 ± 0.08 2.3 ± 0.22
ANOVA (P values)
    Ethanol effect 0.029 0.0007 <0.0001
    SAM effect 0.19 0.14 0.94
    Interaction (Ethanol × SAM) 0.22 0.37 0.69
Mitochondria
    Control 0.037 ± 0.002 0.010 ± 0.0003 3.6 ± 0.17
    Ethanol 0.057 ± 0.005 0.014 ± 0.001 4.1 ± 0.21
    Control + SAM 0.054 ± 0.010 0.009 ± 0.001 5.7 ± 0.67
    Ethanol + SAM 0.082 ± 0.004 0.013 ± 0.001 6.5 ± 0.46
ANOVA (P values)§
    Ethanol effect 0.0008 0.0027 0.138
    SAM effect 0.0022 0.31 <0.0001
    Interaction (Ethanol × SAM) 0.542 0.98 0.81

Data are represented as means ± SE for n = 5 animals per treatment group.

*

Liver concentrations of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) are expressed as nmol·liver−1·g body wt−1 (8).

,§Results from 2-factor ANOVA with ethanol effect (control vs. ethanol), SAM effect (absent vs. present), and interaction (Ethanol × SAM). †Liver values and

§

mitochondria values.

Mitochondrial concentrations of SAM and SAH are expressed as nmol/mg protein.