Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Jan 15;25(2):112–120. doi: 10.1177/1049909107310141

Table 3.

Associations of Physician Intrinsic Religiosity, Religious Affiliation, and Influence of Religion on Medicine With Objections to End of Life Interventionsa

Physician-Assisted suicide
Terminal Sedation
Withdrawal of Life Support
Bivariate
Multivariate
Bivariate
Multivariate
Bivariate
Multivariate
Predictor % OR (95% CI) % OR (95% CI) % OR (95% CI)
All physicians 69 18 5
Intrinsic religiosity
 Low 55 1.0 (referent) 12 1.0 (referent) 4 1.0 (referent)
 Moderate 71b 1.9 (1.3–2.8) 18b 1.6 (1.0–2.7) 4 ns 0.9 (0.3–2.5)
 High 84 4.2 (2.9–6.2) 25 2.6 (1.7–4.1) 7 2.0 (0.9–4.7)
Religious affiliation
 Protestant 75 1.0 (referent) 19 1.0 (referent) 3 1.0 (referent)
 Catholic 79 1.2 (0.8–1.9) 22 1.5 (0.9–2.3) 10 2.8 (1.2–6.6)
 Jewish 50 0.3 (0.2–0.5) 4 0.2 (0.1–0.5) 3 0.8 (0.3–2.8)
 Hindu 74b 0.9 (0.4–1.9) 43b 3.7 (1.8–7.6) 9c 2.1 (0.6–7.4)
 Muslim 79 1.1 (0.4–3.1) 18 1.1 (0.4–3.0) 8 3.4 (0.5–22.2)
 Other religion 81 1.5 (0.8–3.0) 25 1.5 (0.8–3.1) 5 2.5 (0.6–10.2)
 None 39 0.2 (0.1–0.4) 6 0.3 (0.1–0.8) 3 0.9 (0.2–3.8)
Religion influences medicine
 Disagree 58b 1.0 (referent) 13d 1.0 (referent) 4 ns 1.0 (referent)
 Agree 78 2.7 (2.0–3.7) 21 1.8 (1.2–2.6) 6 2.0 (1.0–4.1)

NOTE: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; ns = not significant.

a

Bivariate results present estimated (accounting for survey design) percentages of physicians who object to the intervention. Multivariate results present estimated OR with 95% CI after adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity (not included in analyses of religious affiliation), region, and care of dying.

b

P < .001.

c

P < .05.

d

P < .01.