Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr;35(4):214–218. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027565

Table 4.

Clinical importance of religion, stratified by physicians’ religious characteristics

Moral guidelines from religious traditions given “little to no weight”
Religious beliefs shouldn’t keep doctors from providing legal medical options (agree/strongly agree)
Bivariate
Multivariate*
Bivariate
Multivariate*
Characteristic (n) % P(χ2) OR (95% CI) % P(χ2) OR (95% CI)
Religious affiliation
 No religion (50) 47 0.000 1.0 referent 94 0.000 1.0 referent
 Hindu (91) 51 1.2 (0.5 to 3.0) 96 1.5 (0.3 to 8.8)
 Muslim (75) 37 0.9 (0.3 to 2.5) 94 0.9 (0.2 to 5.5)
 Catholic/Orthodox (92) 29 0.5 (0.2 to 1.1) 72 0.2 (0.04 to 0.8)
 Protestant, evangelical (26) 0 0.0 33 0.04 (0.01 to 0.2)
 Protestant, not evangelical (70) 29 0.4 (0.2 to 0.97) 77 0.3 (0.1 to 1.4)
 Other religion (35) 40 0.7 (0.2 to 2.0) 90 0.7 (0.1 to 5.0)
Intrinsic religious motivation
 Low (153) 56 0.000 1.0 referent 91 0.000 1.0 referent
 Medium (117) 35 0.4 (0.2 to 0.7) 83 0.5 (0.2 to 1.3)
 High (167) 10 0.1 (0.04 to 0.2) 63 0.2 (0.1 to 0.5)
Attend religious services
 Never (53) 55 0.000 1.0 referent 89 0.000 1.0 referent
 Once a month or less (240) 38 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9) 88 0.8 (0.2 to 2.9)
 Twice a month or more (144) 17 0.1 (0.1 to 0.3) 60 0.2 (0.1 to 0.6)
Religious/spiritual
 Neither (93) 58 0.000 1.0 referent 98 0.000 1.0 referent
 Spiritual not religious (100) 41 0.5 (0.3 to 1.1) 83 0.1 (0.03 to 0.8)
 Religious (243) 18 0.2 (0.1 to 0.3) 68 0.1 (0.01 to 0.2)

Table presents population estimates adjusted for survey design.

*

Multivariate analyses include sex, age, region, immigration history, and specialty.

p<0.05.