Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Neoreviews. 2008 Nov 1;9(11):e520. doi: 10.1542/neo.9-11-e520

Table.

Studies of Neonates Weighing <1,500 g Reporting Laboratory Phlebotomy and Red Blood Cell Transfusion Data

Authors N Infant Study Population Postnatal Age Mean Birth Weight (g) Weekly Phlebotomy Loss (mL/kg) Weekly RBC Transfusion Volume (mL/kg) Correlation Phlebotomy versus Transfusion r
Blanchette and Zipursky, 1984 (4) 57 <1,500 g Birth to 6 wk Not reported 11.1 6.7 0.82
Obladen et al, 1988 (5)* 60 <1,500 g Birth to 4 wk 1,161 12.7 10.6 0.91
Ringer et al, 1998 (6) 270 Hospital A: <1,500 g Birth to 2 wk 1,073 8.2 15.7 Not reported
Hospital B: <1,500 g Birth to 2 wk 978 21.4 16.8 Not reported
Alagappan et al, 1998 (7) 80 <1,250 g Birth to 2 wk 948 20.7 21.7 Not reported
Maier et al, 1998 (8)* 79 500 to 1,000 g Birth to 9 wk 800 4.7 4.9 Not reported
Widness et al, 2005 (9) 47 500 to 1,000 g + umbilical artery catheter Birth to 2 wk 734 36.7 22.2 0.73
Mean 949 16.5 14.1 0.82
SD 161 10.8 6.9 0.09
*

European study

Correlation coefficient for phlebotomy volume versus transfusion volume

RBC=red blood cell, SD=standard deviation