Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 12;33(3):475–483. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9733-1

Table 5.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate at follow-up (ml/min/1.73m2)

Estimated GFR Baseline N = 251 6 months FUP N = 154 12 months FUP N = 97
Baseline GFR MILD e-GFR ≥ 60
N = 82 N = 45 N = 29
Mean ± SD 90.32 ± 36.59 85.55 ± 37.24 62.03 ± 26.23
Improvement 8.89% 3.45%
Stabilization 75.56% 58.62%
Worsening 15.56% 37.93%
Baseline e-GFR MODERATE e-GFR ≥30 <60
N = 111 N = 68 N = 48
Mean ±SD 45.37 ± 8.68 49.82 ± 26.87 47.33 ± 15.22
Improvement 27.94% 22.92%
Stabilization 54.41% 62.50%
Worsening 17.65% 14.58%
Baseline GFR SEVERE e-GFR <30
N = 55 N = 41 N = 20
Mean ±SD 20.61 ± 7.31 35.40 ± 25.46a 36.32 ± 22.84†
Improvement 51.22% 50.00%
Stabilization 39.02% 50.00%
Worsening 9.76% 0.00%
Overall population
N = 248 N = 154 N = 97
Mean ± SD 54.74 ± 34.69 56.42 ± 35.66 49.46 ± 22.43
Improvement 28.57% 22.68%
Stabilization 56.49% 58.76%
Worsening 14.94% 18.56%

Estimated glomerular filtration rate using Cockcroft-Gault formula [14]

a p < 0.001 (by Mc Nemar test)

Improvement = Increase of e-GFR by 20% versus baseline

Worsening = Decrease of e-GFR by 20% versus baseline

Stabilization = No worsening