Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 10;19(5):987–999. doi: 10.1002/pro.376

Table II.

Comparison of Key Properties and Nature of the Active Sites of the Four Known LonP Structures

hLonP MjLonP EcLonP AfLonP
PDB ID 1xhk 1rre 1z0w and so forth
LonA/B A B A B
Kingdom Eukaryote Archaea Eubacteria Archaea
Mutant S to A Some mutants
Oligomer Monomer/dimer Monomer (dimer not biological) Hexamer Monomers and hexamers
Active site 310 or β strand 310 310 β strand β strand in all
Extended loop contact to adjacent subunit in hexamer Cannot, as 310 Cannot, as 310 Yes Yes, but different from EcLonP
Ser-Lys Dyad Yes Yes Yes, mutant, modelled No
Asp blocking Active Site Yes Yes No No
Lysine Forms dyad, but buried by Asp Forms dyad, but buried by Asp Forms dyad Accessible but no dyad
Active site Closed form Closed form, inactive Open form, no Asp and Trp No dyad, serine points away
Proposed activity based on conformation Inactive Inactive Active with modeled serine Inactive, serine in wrong place to form dyad