Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Opt. 2009 Jul 20;48(21):4270–4277. doi: 10.1364/ao.48.004270

Table 1.

Comparison of CV%’s When Using Full (0–100%) Versus Restricted (20–50%) Forces

CV%
Category Force Range ctO2Hb ctHHb ctH2O Lipid
Pre (N = 5) Full 5.5 ± 4.2 4.0 ± 3.1 2.6 ± 0.8 3.4 ± 0.5
Restricted 5.0 ± 2.2 3.6 ± 1.5 1.9 ± 1.3 2.0 ± 1.0
Post (N = 3) Full 7.7 ± 3.3 5.4 ± 1.5 2.1 ± 2.1 1.9 ± 1.6
Restricted 7.0 ± 2.2 5.0 ± 1.3 1.3 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 0.5
Lesion (N = 3) Full 6.8 ± 4.2 4.5 ± 3.1 2.2 ± 0.8 2.0 ± 0.5
Restricted 5.0 ± 2.3 3.7 ± 2.7 1.4 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.8
All (N = 11) Full 6.5 ± 3.1 4.6 ± 2.0 2.5 ± 1.5 2.3 ± 1.1
Restricted 5.6 ± 2.7 4.1 ± 1.7 1.5 ± 0.8 1.7 ± 0.8